December 22, 2024

Idavox Archives

Archived articles originally found on the One People's Project website.

ACORN, CENTER FOR CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS FILE SUIT TO RESTORE ACORN FUNDING

As we noted in the yesterday’s article, while Hal Turner was busy with his trial in one courtroom, ACORN was in the one next door. ACORN Bertha Lewis, other top officials and ACORN members and supporters were there to get their federal funding back after Congress allowed the right-wing lynching attempt on the group to prompt them to strip them of such. You might not have heard much about the court date, and if you get your news from the “fair and balanced” Faux News, you more than likely never heard about this at all. Might have something to do with the fact that the government doesn’t have a case and just might lose it. It was indeed a pleasant surprise to see everyone come out in support for ACORN, but it is especially heartwarming to see folks who fight back when the right tries to demonize them. It doesn’t happen often, which sucks because when it does, the right backs off. The Center for Consitiutional Rights, who are representing ACORN in court filed this report.

Center for Constitutional Rights

December 4, 2009, New York – Today, the Center for Constitutional Rights (CCR) argued a case challenging Congress’ unconstitutional de-funding of the Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now (ACORN). The case charges Congress with violating the Bill of Attainder provision in the U.S. Constitution, violating the Fifth Amendment right to due process, and infringing on the First Amendment right to freedom of association by targeting affiliated and allied organizations, as well. CCR attorneys say members of Congress violated the Constitution by declaring an organization guilty of a crime and punishing it and its members without benefit of a trial.

Said CCR Cooperating Attorney Jules Lobel: “Congress cannot act as judge, jury, and executioner. We have due process in this country, and our Constitution forbids lawmakers from singling out a person or group for punishment without a fair investigation and trial. Congress, as well as individuals and organizations must abide by the rule of law.”

The lawsuit seeks a preliminary injunction to stop Congress from singling out an organization for punishment without proper investigation or due process. The plaintiffs are ACORN, the ACORN Institute and the New York ACORN Housing Company. The suit is ACORN v. USA and was filed in federal court in the Eastern District of New York.

Said CCR Legal Director Bill Quigley: “We are used to seeing political grandstanding in Congress, but when it crosses the line into violating the Constitution, it has to stop. Big banks, pharmaceutical companies and private government contractors that have skirted the law are rewarded with bailouts, tax credits and billions of dollars in new contracts. Companies with multiple criminal convictions remain in favor, while Congress, without a shred of due process, joined in the scapegoating of an organization that helps average Americans going through hard times to get homes, pay their taxes, and vote. Who’s next?”

Since the vote to temporarily ban all federal funds from ACORN and its affiliates, related organizations have suffered. For example, in an affidavit filed in today’s lawsuit, an ACORN affiliate wholly separate from the national organization charges it has been unfairly affected. The organization, ACORN Institute (AI), had grants pending to provide computer training, asthma education, tax preparation and GED classes, among other programs. The affidavit avers that no grant the organization has received and administrated “has ever even allegedly involved any misconduct, misappropriation, fraud or other illegal conduct. AI has never been indicted nor convicted of any crime, nor…has any AI employee ever been indicted or convicted of a crime in conjunction with any work they have done for AI. AI has never been denied any grant from any federal agency due to fraud or other alleged misconduct.”

Jules Lobel is lead counsel in the case; other counsel include CCR Legal Director Bill Quigley and CCR Staff Attorney Darius Charney; CCR Cooperating Attorneys Bill Goodman and Julie Hurwitz of Goodman & Hurwitz, Detroit, MI; and attorney Arthur Schwartz of New York.

Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now (ACORN) v. USA

Case Overview

On November 12, 2009, the Center for Constitutional Rights (CCR) filed a case challenging Congress’s unconstitutional defunding of the Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now (ACORN). The case charges Congress with violating the Bill of Attainder provision in the U.S. Constitution, violating the Fifth Amendment right to due process, and infringing on the First Amendment right to freedom of association by targeting affiliated and allied organizations, as well. CCR attorneys say members of Congress violated the Constitution by declaring an organization guilty of a crime and punishing it and its members without benefit of a trial.

The lawsuit seeks a temporary restraining order to prevent the government from reallocating funds designated for the organization and its affiliates and a preliminary injunction to stop Congress from singling out a single organization for punishment without proper investigation or due process. The plaintiffs are ACORN, the ACORN Institute, and the New York ACORN Housing Company. The suit is ACORN v. USA and was filed in federal court in the Eastern District of New York.

Translate »