NET NEUTRALITY'S WEEK THAT WAS

So President Obama supports Net Neutrality, and that sparks that tired Pavolian response from conservatives that says anything Obama supports, they have to go against, never mind the fact that Net Neutrality is responsible for much of the media, commerce and lifestyle of pretty much every person living on this globe in the 21st Century, including conservatives! This is one time they are just going to have to let their petty nonsense go, but in the meantime, here’s a rundown on how things went this week.

NPR

Each week, we take a look back at headlines in the technology and society space, but Monday’s net neutrality move by President Obama was the biggest headline by a mile. So we’ve tweaked the typical roundup to focus on net neutrality, with some additional headlines at the end.

The Proposal: Obama threw his full support behind a proposal to classify broadband Internet service as a Title II utility, which I briefly blogged about and Joel Rose explained on the radio.

Wheeler’s response: FCC Chairman Tom Wheeler has his own ideas, a more “hybrid” approach, for how to handle the issue. He runs an agency that is independent of the president. As The Washington Post reported:

“The dissonance between Obama and Wheeler has the makings of a major policy fight affecting multibillion-dollar industries. The president wants clear rules to prevent Internet service providers from auctioning the fastest speeds to the highest bidders, a scenario that could favor rich Web firms over start-ups.

“Wheeler, a former lobbyist for the cable and telecommunications industry, has floated proposals that aim to limit the ability of service providers to charge Web companies, such as Netflix or Google, to reach their customers. But critics have argued that his approach would give the providers too much leeway to favor some services over others.”

Ted Cruz Reacts: The U.S. senator from Texas and a favorite of the far right came out with a tweet blasting Obama’s position, likening net neutrality to Obamacare. Cruz then backed it up with this op-ed in The Washington Post, arguing, “Government-regulated utilities invariably destroy innovation and freedom. … If the federal government seizes the power to regulate Internet pricing and goods and services, the regulations will never end.”

The Public: Andrew Sullivan’s blog reminds us the general principle of net neutrality is overwhelmingly popular, with this chart showing 81 percent of respondents oppose “paid prioritization” — letting cable companies charge content providers for “faster lanes” to customers. Net neutrality regulations are intended to prevent that. The debate now, is over how those regulations should be enforced.